SDCIBGQ5OJGCA24ZSZFTXIPGNNUAQPLYBEM56OKKIMPZ45U6CYFQC QAXLX3UAV6R66K2GERT7FJBPNULWAUSO3DFME3CLEZDBG55I4IRAC RMDMAYRXYBU5OQXV5HSF6LFD4NBMKRNH5EPIVW3K5HAV6D56IG6QC SXEYMYF7P4RZMZ46WPL4IZUTSQ2ATBWYZX7QNVMS3SGOYXYOHAGQC I24UEJQLCH2SOXA4UHIYWTRDCHSOPU7AFTRUOTX7HZIAV4AZKYEQC FXEDPLRI7PXLDXV634ZA6D5Q3ZWG3ESTKJTMRPJ4MAHI7PKU3M6AC I52XSRUH5RVHQBFWVMAQPTUSPAJ4KNVID2RMI3UGCVKFLYUO6WZAC CCLLB7OIFNFYJZTG3UCI7536TOCWSCSXR67VELSB466R24WLJSDAC // Since we are replacing the value, we don't want to// decrement its reference counter (which del would do), hence// the transmute.//// This would normally be wrong. The only reason it works is// because we know that dbs_channels has never been forked// from another database, hence all the reference counts to// its elements are 1 (and therefore represented as "not// referenced" in Sanakirja).