---
title : "Basics: Functional Programming in Agda"
permalink : /Basics
---
\begin{code}
open import Data.Empty using (⊥; ⊥-elim)
open import Relation.Nullary using (¬_; Dec; yes; no)
open import Relation.Binary.PropositionalEquality
using (_≡_; refl; _≢_; trans; sym)
\end{code}
# Natural numbers
\begin{code}
data ℕ : Set where
zero : ℕ
suc : ℕ → ℕ
{-# BUILTIN NATURAL ℕ #-}
\end{code}
\begin{code}
congruent : ∀ {m n} → m ≡ n → suc m ≡ suc n
congruent refl = refl
injective : ∀ {m n} → suc m ≡ suc n → m ≡ n
injective refl = refl
distinct : ∀ {m} → zero ≢ suc m
distinct ()
\end{code}
\begin{code}
_≟_ : ∀ (m n : ℕ) → Dec (m ≡ n)
zero ≟ zero = yes refl
zero ≟ suc n = no (λ())
suc m ≟ zero = no (λ())
suc m ≟ suc n with m ≟ n
... | yes refl = yes refl
... | no p = no (λ r → p (injective r))
\end{code}
# Addition and its properties
\begin{code}
_+_ : ℕ → ℕ → ℕ
zero + n = n
suc m + n = suc (m + n)
\end{code}
\begin{code}
+-assoc : ∀ m n p → (m + n) + p ≡ m + (n + p)
+-assoc zero n p = refl
+-assoc (suc m) n p rewrite +-assoc m n p = refl
+-zero : ∀ m → m + zero ≡ m
+-zero zero = refl
+-zero (suc m) rewrite +-zero m = refl
+-suc : ∀ m n → m + (suc n) ≡ suc (m + n)
+-suc zero n = refl
+-suc (suc m) n rewrite +-suc m n = refl
+-comm : ∀ m n → m + n ≡ n + m
+-comm m zero = +-zero m
+-comm m (suc n) rewrite +-suc m n | +-comm m n = refl
\end{code}
# Equality and decidable equality for naturals
# Showing `double` injective
\begin{code}
double : ℕ → ℕ
double zero = zero
double (suc n) = suc (suc (double n))
\end{code}
\begin{code}
double-injective : ∀ m n → double m ≡ double n → m ≡ n
double-injective zero zero refl = refl
double-injective zero (suc n) ()
double-injective (suc m) zero ()
double-injective (suc m) (suc n) r =
congruent (double-injective m n (injective (injective r)))
\end{code}
In Coq, the inductive proof for `double-injective`
is sensitive to how one inducts on `m` and `n`. In Agda, that aspect
is straightforward. However, Agda requires helper functions for
injection and congruence which are not required in Coq.
I can remove the use of `congruent` by rewriting with its argument.
Is there an easy way to remove the two uses of `injective`?